Showing posts with label Loan Modification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Loan Modification. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

ARE YOUR PROBLEMS TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT?

If you’re thinking about applying for a loan modification, without professional help, you should answer the following questions first:

1. Are your financial troubles temporary or permanent?
If you answer “temporary”, as almost everyone believes or wants to believe their financial problems are, you may have just lost your Making Home Affordable loan modification. 

If you answer “permanent”, you may have just lost any other type of loan modification for which you would otherwise have qualified. 

The correct answer is anybody’s guess, but your “guess” may well disqualify you, as it did for one poor guy appearing on the 10 O’clock news a week or so ago. He said “temporary” , and months later he got a rejection letter from his bank. The reason given for the loan modification rejection? ‘Your financial problems are only temporary.’ Permanent or temporary, his problems were sufficient for him to lose his home to foreclosure.

2. Do you receive any child support or alimony/maintenance?
Answering yes to this question can qualify you or disqualify you for a loan modification. Only the review of your financial situation can determine how best to answer this question. Note that you have the option of providing this information for consideration, or not providing it.

3. If you have others living in your home, are you receiving income from them, or are they helping with household expenses?
Again, your financial situation will dictate how best to answer these questions. We never advocate lying or misleading a lender. However, there is some information which you must disclose, and some information which need not be disclosed. There are also different options on how to include this information. You can report reduced household expenses based on the contribution of your boarder toward those expenses, or you can prepare a formal lease even if the boarder is a relative like your son, or you can sometimes include your boarder’s gross monthly income. Only a financial analysis will disclose how best to report or present this information to your lender. The way you present this information to the bank, even though the net financial result to you for having a boarder is the same, could easily determine whether you get your loan modification.

Conclusion: If you don’t know who really owns your loan, if you’re not adept at the necessary financial analysis for a loan modification, if you don’t know the difference between net and gross income, or if you don’t know whether one or the other needs to be higher or lower to qualify for a loan modification, then you shouldn’t be playing this game. It would be a bit like playing poker when you don’t know if a flush beats a straight. Yes, you might get lucky, but there’s a lot at stake in this game.

If you don’t know the answers to the above questions, please make sure and learn them before you call your bank for a loan modification. Also, fair warning… these are not the only tricky questions your banker may ask.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

SHOULD I CALL MY BANK FOR A LOAN MODIFICATION?

The more I talk to banks and new clients that have already talked to their bank, the more concerned I become. Here’s one true story that shocked me:

A client came to my office after trying unsuccessfully for four months to get a loan modification from her bank. During that time, she fell further behind on her mortgage. I determined quickly that her loan was owned by Freddie Mac. Her bank never told her that. I did the financial analysis, and found she qualified in all respects for the government Making Home Affordable, MHA, loan modification. The bank would have to approve her. She was happy.

When reviewing the information my client had previously given the bank, I noticed an entry of $500 per month for child support. She hadn’t mentioned that income to me. She told me she didn’t receive child support, but the guy at the bank told her she needed about $500 more income to qualify for a modification. So, she told him that her daughter’s father sometimes gives cash to help out with expenses. In reality, there was no court-ordered child support, she rarely saw her daughter’s father, and she never received money from him. He never had much to give. Her daughter may have occasionally received a few dollars or a Happy Meal, but my client never received anything.

After further analysis, I found that including that extra $500 of monthly income, which she never received, was just enough to disqualify my client for a loan modification. It put her just under the 31% DTI ratio needed to qualify. My client thought the guy from the bank was doing her a favor by telling her what she needed to qualify. In fact, he told her just what she needed to be disqualified.
The happy ending to this story is that my client was approved for a Making Home Affordable loan modification.

The lesson is that you better know the rules before you play this game. Had my client not sought professional help, she would not have been approved for the modification, and might have lost her home in foreclosure by now. I don’t know if the “supposed help” from the guy at the bank was an intentional attempt to derail her application, or if it was simply advice from an unknowledgeable bank employee. Either way, the result was the same; the borrower would not have received a loan modification because she acted inappropriately on the advice of the bank.

You could take a stern view and say it isn’t a bank’s fault if a borrower doesn’t qualify because of “lies” on a loan modification application. I would agree with you if the bank doesn’t describe, quantify, and encourage a dishonest act by indicating it may be the only way for a borrower to prevent foreclosure.  That’s especially true when a bank should have initially approved an applicant based on the information provided prior to any bank manipulation or coaxing. 

Be careful out there. It’s tough to figure out who you can trust.  There are certainly some loan modfication firms you can’t trust (law firm based or not), and now you have to add banks to your list.
Finally, a quick tip… Please, please don’t use an out-of-state company to apply for your loan modification; particularly if the company is from California or Florida. The company would likely be in violation of Illinois law, whether a law firm or not.  Also, what will you do when the company doesn’t get a modification and doesn’t refund your money? Find an Illinois attorney with an office within driving distance from your home.Then visit the office to get an idea of the quality of the people and operation.

Good Luck.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

WHO SHOULD NOT DO THEIR OWN LOAN MODIFICATION?

There are some situations in which I recommend you seek legal assistance. The first such situation is if you are more than 2 months late on your mortgage and have not already applied for a modification. Consider the following:

Could my home be sold at a foreclosure auction while the bank is reviewing my Loan Modification request? YES!

I’m not trying to sensationalize this issue. It is a serious risk, and you must be aware of it in order to prevent it! Below are two important examples, and they are not hypothetical. They are real examples of Chicago area homeowners who came to me this year, and they are not rare occurrences.
Today, most lenders and servicers continue foreclosure proceedings while they are evaluating a request for a loan modification. The reason being if the loan modification is not approved, foreclosure can follow quickly. Lenders tell borrowers that although foreclosure proceedings will continue, any foreclosure sale will be postponed until the loan modification decision has been made. However, I’ve not seen any lender put that in writing.

Example 1 - In December, 2008, a young man was trying to help his mother get a loan modification. As a former loan officer, he had considerable experience with mortgages and banks. The bank had already filed a foreclosure lawsuit, but repeatedly assured the young man that the December foreclosure auction would be postponed until after a decision was made on the loan modification, which looked promising. In January, the man and his mother learned the foreclosure auction had not been postponed, and his mother’s home had been sold on December 23, two days before Christmas.

Example 2 - A man qualified for a loan modification under the new Home Affordable Modification Program, HAMP. The lender had filed a foreclosure lawsuit before HAMP was announced, but stated repeatedly it would not allow the home to be sold at a foreclosure auction before a decision had been made on the loan modification. Days before the auction, the lender had not yet approved the modification and had not yet postponed the foreclosure sale. Two business days before the auction, I learned after a multitude of calls, that the bank had intended to go forward with the foreclosure auction with no advance notice to the borrower. One of the bank’s inspectors said a neighbor said that nobody lived at the property. The property appeared to be abandoned, and along with the neighbor’s comment, the bank felt it had sufficient evidence to determine the property was ABANDONED. Since the property was vacant, the owner no longer qualified for the HAMP loan modification. Therefore, the foreclosure sale was on. One business day before the foreclosure auction, I was able to prove to the bank’s satisfaction, with emailed pictures from a cell phone, and faxed copies of utility bills, that the owner still lived in the home. The bank cancelled the foreclosure auction and the borrower got his loan modification. The result might have been much different. Even with a lawyer representing you, your home can be sold out from under you through foreclosure.

A few words about abandonment… If you abandon your home, you will not qualify for a HAMP loan modification; and why would a lender give you a modification anyway? It wouldn’t. Unfortunately, for various reasons, homes in foreclosure often appear abandoned when they are not.
Following are characteristics of a typical home in foreclosure, but not yet sold at auction:
- All the drapes, upstairs and down, are tightly closed
- The lawn and bushes are overgrown and neglected
- There are numerous old newspapers on the front door step
- No lights are on inside the home at night
- Nobody answers the front or back door when you knock
- The paint is peeling, some windows are broken, and the home is the eyesore of the neighborhood
If you knew nothing about homes in foreclosure, and visited a typical one, you would think it was abandoned. That’s what the occupants want you and bill collectors and neighbors and the rest of the world to think. However, most likely, it’s not abandoned, even if the neighbors think it is. If you spent just one day with an investor looking at foreclosure properties, you would know this well. People with financial problems don’t leave “free accommodations” to go and pay rent elsewhere. Also, they’re often too embarrassed and/or depressed to face the outside world. The very last thing these people want to do is mow their lawn or paint the trim, so they don’t.

The point of this discussion is that if your home resembles the typical foreclosure home, you should find a way to let the lender know you still occupy the property, and you want to keep your home. Send the lender letters with your return address. Send utility bills showing you’re still using gas or water at the home. Don’t allow the lender to label your home as abandoned, if it is not.

How often does this happen? The above examples relate to 2 of my first 8 clients this year. Another of those first 8 clients was locked out of a home by the bank for months because a neighbor told a bank inspector that nobody lived there. The bank quickly boarded up the windows, changed the locks, and proceeded with foreclosure on the basis that the home had been abandoned. We later regained occupancy of the home, and proceeded with the loan modification. It is not a rare occurrence for a bank to proceed with a foreclosure sale when it should not, or when it is mandated to provide a loan modification under HAMP. For about half of my clients, I must keep a close eye on the lender’s foreclosure activities because I know what might happen if I don’t.

I doubt that inappropriate foreclosure sales are due to intentional misdeeds of the lender, but that makes little difference to the homeowners. However, as a homeowner, you must be aware that these incidents do occur, and that your options will be limited after a foreclosure sale.